Mom and daughter support sexual education program in spite of uproar

SHAWNEE, Kan. — The controversy over sexual education material at Hocker Grove Middle School continues. On Wednesday, one mom and her Hocker Grove daughter are speaking out in support of the program.

A huge response from viewers about this story followed since we first reported it on Tuesday night, and it’s all about the terms on a classroom poster.

“It’s just a poster, eye-popping, but it’s better they show us now than later on,” eighth grade student Lyssa Watland said.

Watland goes to Hocker Grove Middle school and was in sex ed. class when the teacher put the poster up to teach students ways people express their sexual feelings. It is causing an uproar among some because it contains graphic sex acts that may be deemed inappropriate.

“There are kids honestly that are my age who are sexually active and they don`t know the consequences,” Lyssa said.

Her mom, Jennifer,said she agrees with her daughter.

‘I’m for it, I’m for the sex education course,” Lyssa’s mom, Jennifer, said.

When asked by FOX 4’s Shannon O’Brien if she agrees with the terminology on the poster going as far as it does, she said it’s something of a gray area.

“You know, it’s hard to say yes and it’s hard to say no, but it happens,” Jennifer said.

She said she got a notice from the school about the sex ed. class and signed off on the permission slip so her daughter could attend. But it did not include the graphic nature of some of the teaching materials.

“That is alarming, I`m not going to lie, absolutely alarming,” Jennifer said.

Shawnee Mission Superintendent Dr. Jim Hinson said he felt the language was too racy.

“I find that language offensive, I really do and so when we’re teaching human sexuality, again, there’s a balance. What’s appropriate at what age level? What’s not appropriate? It`s a really difficult decision,” Dr. Hinson said.

Dr. Hinson explained that the school system teaches abstinence. He has pulled the material until a panel of educators decides whether the material is appropriate.

“Society has changed a lot. Kids have access to a lot of information they didn’t have access to previously,” he said.

Jennifer said that the material on the poster pales in comparison to what she’s seen on social media.

“I’ve read through my daughter’s Facebook, seen her news feed and her friends on there. The things they’ve posted, you’d be astounded,” she said.

Lyssa said that with or without the poster, her classmates already know about the content the poster presented.

“You can say all you want, that your children don’t know these things, but they’ve been knowing these things since maybe, the age of 10,” she said.

Dr. Hinson says the school board nor himself approved the poster, it was instituted last year by the curriculum department. He is trying to figure out what the reasoning behind creating it was, but the people who worked in the curriculum department no longer work there, so he is starting from scratch.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

5 comments

  • Barbara

    Wake up Kansas. Your youth are sexually active and they need Sex Education. Kansas was my home for 39 and it embarrasses me more and more every day- now this! Horrible. I am very educated, with one of my undergrad degrees from KU and I speak from being a Health Education Director and a program directory of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Abstinence Education does not work.

  • Dan Beyer

    Anyone who says that Abstinence Education doesn’t work isn’t thinking logically but is ideologically driven! Abstinence is 100% effective against pregnancy! Logically. Abstinence is 100% effective against sexually transmitted diseases! Logically. Abstinence is 100% effective against early/unplanned parenthood! Logically. Teaching self control is NOT a bad thing, but a good thing to do! Logically. For anyone to say we need to take that tool out of the collective toolbox doesn’t really care about kids and is totally agenda driven. Abstinence Education DOES work when given a fair chance. But this poster has absolutely nothing to do with Abstinence Education. It is yet one more of the innumerable examples of the continual sexualization of our children that goes on every day in our schools. And it’s being more and more promoted to younger and younger children all the time. That’s criminal. And it’s hypocritical from those who claim they want to prevent students from pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases!

    • Barbara

      Education is power and it is obvious you have no education on the subject. The is no research to say that Abstinence Education works. In Comprehensive Sexuality Education students learn about how to abstain and how to prevent STD’s and pregnancies.

  • Dan Beyer

    Abstinence is 100% effective against teen pregnancies and STD’s. Period. For every study you find that says Abstinence Education doesn’t work, I can find one that says it does! Teaching students the positives of SELF CONTROL is not a bad thing! That actions have consequences!!! That’s a very good thing to teach teenagers! And anyone who would promote an agenda over that, is extremely irresponsible. I still don’t see any reason whatsoever to take that tool away from students! It’s a good tool that when used properly, has a 100% success rate! That’s a good thing!

    • jatheist

      You seem to misunderstand the sex-ed curriculum. What has been shown not to work is abstinence-ONLY sex-ed. The curriculum now teaches abstinence along with safe-sex and tools to avoid pregnancies/STDs.

      And your claim that abstinence works %100 isn’t exactly accurate… or haven’t you heard about the virgin Mary and her son JC? ;)