Support Salvation Army Wildfire Relief

State of the Union: Pres. expected to nudge Congress about inaction on key issues

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON D.C. — White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said President Barack Obama’s plan to take more action in 2014-even without congressional approval-shouldn’t be considered a threat to lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

“I don’t think it’s confrontational. It’s ‘Let’s find areas to work together,'” he said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “There are some items right before Congress we can do together.”

He mentioned immigration reform, extending unemployment benefits, patent reform and the farm bill as possible items that could be accomplished with bipartisan support.

But, Pfeiffer added, “the President is not going to tell the American people that he’s going to wait for Congress.”

“He’s going to move forward in areas like job training, education, manufacturing, on his own to try to restore opportunity for American families,” he told CNN’s chief political correspondent Candy Crowley.

Previewing Obama’s upcoming State of the Union address on Tuesday, Pfeiffer sent an e-mail message to supporters Saturday that said Obama will lay out a “set of real, concrete, practical proposals.”

He reiterated Sunday that 2014 will be a “year of action” and the President “is going to look in every way he can, with his pen and his phone, to try to move the ball forward.”

Pfeiffer agreed with the characterization that Obama will be using his bully pulpit more often this year.

“Absolutely, absolutely,” he said. “We do that in big ways and some small ways. … We are putting an extra emphasis on it in 2014.”

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, said on “State of the Union” that the White House’s approach “sounds vaguely like a threat.”

“I think it also has a certain amount of arrogance in the sense that one of the fundamental principles of our country were the checks and balances, that it wasn’t supposed to be easy to pass legislation,” Paul said.

“It’s hard to convince people to get legislation through,” Paul said. “It takes consensus. But that’s what he needs to be doing is building consensus, and not taking his pen and creating law.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

4 comments

  • Jon Bowers

    Looks like hope and change was just a bunch of snake oil because its business as usual in Washington. Transparency? Well, that was just a “campaign promise”, and thats all they were. The only transparency going on is the transparency of your personal life to the NSA.

  • michael

    Mr. Obama’s abuse of executive privilege worries me the most. He seems to feel that Congress is there to rubber stamp his agenda and if they don’t, he’ll just act on his own. Our system of checks and balances exists for a reason and is one of the foundations upon which our republic exists. Obamacare is probably the biggest lie and pending financial disaster cast upon the American people. It has to be repealed. Endless scandal after scandal, Benghazi, Solyndra, bugging phones used by AP and other reporters (and the reporter’s seeming lack of anger toward the president for it which tells me they’re his press, not the public’s.) His disengenuous claims that his record low approval numbers are because whites are racists although somehow more than half of the white voters elected him TWICE. He is a failed president, and empty suit. He lies to suit his purposes and promote his agenda. November can’t come quickly enough.