Cavity in dental coverage in Missouri could be filled

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Missourians on Medicaid haven't had dental coverage since 2005. Now the legislature appears ready to fill that cavity.

Dabbie Johnson has no teeth. Sixteen badly decayed ones were pulled in recent months at Seton Center's dental clinic.

"It affects everything -- getting a job, the way people judge you," said the 35-year-old Kansas City woman.

She believes some teeth would have been saved if she'd had dental coverage under Medicaid. It was eliminated by Missouri lawmakers in 2005.

"I suffered. I suffered a lot because there was only the emergency room and, you know, after a while the emergency room got tired of seeing me because I didn't make it to dental 'cause I didn't have the money to afford it," said Johnson.

Now Missouri House and Senate committees want to restore coverage, putting $48 million in state and federal dollars in next year's budget. That follows a report showing emergency room visits by Medicaid patients for dental problems have skyrocketed.

"We need our legislative body to understand that, in fact, they'll save a great deal of money by taking care of people's dental needs first," said Sister Loreto Marie Colwell, the executive director of Seton Center.

She says routine care can prevent costly dental and medical problems. In 2009, we introduced you to a Sedalia woman who couldn't afford to have an abscessed tooth pulled and wound up in intensive care. The medical bill was $150,000.

Lawmakers, including State Senator Rob Schaaf of St. Joseph, now support the dental funding after opposing it then.

Johnson won't be toothless much longer. She's getting dentures free through a United Way grant.

"I get my life back, my smile back. It means everything to me," said Johnson.

She believes if Medicaid coverage is restored, other smiles can be saved.

Missouri lawmakers need to work out exactly how the dental funds would be spent before the bill gets final approval.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

5 comments

  • wellnessclinician

    I am glad she is getting help but have to wonder why the help was not available to help her keep her teeth.
    People need to understand that making health a priority is a personal choice; I understand that when when you are struggling to meet your basic needs for food and shelter it is difficult to get adequate care but I see many people regularly spending up to a hundred dollars on non essential items like sporting events and recreational activities then these same people complain they can NOT afford health or dental services; people need to get priorities straight and get over the sense of entitlement that someone else needs to pay for their health/dental care while they spend their available money on luxury items.

    • wellnessclinician

      Having testing for contributing factors (ie meth use) should be incorporated into any government assistance; it is unreasonable for tax payers to pay for services for someone that continues to make lifestyle choices that negate the care provided. The lifestyle is a personal choice but one also chooses the consequences of that lifestyle.