As 2014 approaches, say goodbye to 40 and 60 watt light bulbs

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

NEW YORK — Light bulb manufacturers will cease making traditional 40 and 60-watt light bulbs — the most popular in the country — at the start of 2014.

This comes after the controversial phasing out of incandescent 75 and 100-watt light bulbs at the beginning of 2013.

In their place will be halogen bulbs, compact fluorescent bulbs, LED bulbs and high efficiency incandescents — which are just regular incandescents that have the filament wrapped in gas. All are significantly more expensive than traditional light bulbs, but offer significant energy and costs savings over the long run. (Some specialty incandescents — such as three-way bulbs — will still be available.)

The end of old light bulbs will likely anger some consumers that are already faced with higher prices for a variety of goods. But it will also tick off tea party activists since the ban is the result of the final phase of government-mandated efficiency standards.

The rules were signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2007. They are designed to address gross inefficiencies with old light bulbs — only 10% of the energy they use is converted into light, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, which has a handy fact sheet about the changes. The rest is wasted as heat.

But the rules have drawn fire from a number of circles — mainly conservatives and libertarians who are unhappy about the government telling people what light bulbs they can use. They argue that if the new ones really are so good, people will buy them on their own without being forced to do so.

The Republican-controlled House first tried to overturn the law. When that failed, Congress prevented the Department of Energy from spending money to enforce the new rules.

But light bulb makers still have no plans to make the old bulbs after the first of the year, noting the law is still the law and that state attorneys general have the power to enforce it.

“We haven’t seen any problems with respect to compliance,” said Kyle Pitsor, vice president for government relations at the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, which represents 95% of all light bulb makers in the United States.

The manufacturers association was a big supporter of the new rules, arguing they headed off a patchwork of pending state laws that would have made the business highly complicated.

While there were initial grumblings from consumers when the ban was first announced, Pitsor said most of the concerns faded away as people become more familiar with the new light bulbs and realize they can still buy high efficiency incandescents.

Experts point out how much consumers can save with more efficient bulbs.

The high efficiency incandescents cost about $1.50 each, compared to 50 cents or so for the old bulbs. But they last twice as long, and use 28% less power.

With LEDs, the saving are even greater. While a 40-watt LED goes for about $7.50 — a big drop from the $50 or so it cost just a few years back — it uses 85% less energy than a traditional bulb.

Over the course of the year, a LED will consume about $2 in power under normal circumstances, said Mark Voykovik, national light bulb merchant for Home Depot. That compares to over $7 for an incandescent.

“In two years, you pay off that bulb,” said Voykovik. And because LED bulbs are expected to last at least 20 years — it’s all savings for the next 18 years.

Moreover, LEDs are free from many of the issues that plagued compact fluorescent bulbs. They turn on instantly, do not contain mercury and give off a warm light similar to an incandescent.

People with big electricity bills seem to be taking notice. Home Depot recently released a map showing who is buying more efficient bulbs. While typically “green” places such as San Francisco, Seattle and Boston made the top 10, so did Atlanta, Orlando and Miami.

Fayetteville, Ark. and Waco, Texas were also hot markets, a fact Home Depot attributed to local rebate programs and the warm climate, where air conditioning drives up power bills.

Nationwide, about 12% of a home’s power bill goes towards lighting, according to the EPA.

While LED sales are growing rapidly — Voykovik said they doubled in each of the last two years at Home Depot — most consumers still opt for incandescent bulbs. The percent of sales that are LEDs are in the single digits, he said.

The same was true at Lowe’s, where a spokeswoman said over 50% of sales were incandescent bulbs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Wayne Finn

    I use daylight color spiral bulbs in some fixtures (never will go back to that ugly soft white again, photos, paint, everything looks so much better with daylight bulbs) and also quite a few LED bulbs. I have several online retailers I cycle through because buying them in store is way too overpriced. Their markup is ridiculous. Be smart, shop around and use the internet for a much better deal. Being energy efficient and cost efficient is a much better way to go. I bought three LED bulbs for the price of one at HDepot. BTW… for LED lights a 60W equivalent is best. They have 40W on sale a lot but the output is not the best.

  • Jonathan

    I have the LED & the fluroscent bulbs that over the past 2 years I have been using in my home and they are not at all better for cost. About every 2 months I have to replace fluroscent because they burn out and LED bulbs last about a year. My parents have had the same issue at thier house so needless to say its not just one house. These are with GE bulbs that are supposedly good. Much less convenient, more expensive, and are supposed to be disposed of in a hazmat way.

  • Linda M

    I had purchased several of these new bulbs than have claims of lasting 7-10 years. The rooms their in I don’t use lights much so they might last that long. But you have no where near the light needed as the old 60 watt bulbs gave. I have regular 60 watts in my kitchen, dining room and basement as I want to see clearly. These new bulbs that boast giving the same light using less energy simply isn’t true when it comes to lighting. It’s like losing clarity and crispness, needless to say I don’t care for them. You don’t want them in the bathroom either if your a female and want true light for applying make-up. And their claims to using less energy I don’t believe either. Over the last 2 years my electrical usage has gone up, not from me using the lights more but rather the lights themselves. Then there is the fact they have mercury in them, making them a heath hazard and they can not be disposed of in the regular trash. The government has no right telling people what type of light bulbs they can or can not use in their homes, this is a part of our personal individual lives they have no business.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.