Vet accused of secretly keeping family’s pet alive for blood transfusions

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

FORT WORTH, Texas – A veterinarian’s office is under investigation after one family claims their dog was kept alive for blood transfusion purposes for six months after they were advised to have him euthanized.

According to the Star-Telegram Jamie and Marian Harris said they had taken the family’s then four-year-old Leonberger, Sid, into the Camp Bowie Animal Clinic in Fort Worth to be examined by veterinarian Lou Tierce in May 2013. The couple said by October of 2013 Dr. Tierce had told them the animal needed to be euthanized due to an incurable degenerative spinal condition.

Marian says she learned just days ago, after receiving a phone call from a former employee of the clinic, that her beloved family pet was actually still alive and being “bled” for plasma for the use of blood transfusions in other dogs. The phone call came six months after she was told he would be euthanized within 24 hours last fall. She says she was told Sid was being neglected and had been forced to live in a cage at the clinic all the while the family thought he had been laid to rest.

“The biggest hurt in all of this is the deception and what it means with something that means so much to you,” she told the Star-Telegram. “Our pets are family members.”

On Tuesday, the Fort Worth police and members of the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners raided the clinic and seized two dogs from the premise as evidence in the investigation. The family filed a complaint with the state and hired an attorney to represent them. The attorney, Jim Eggleston, said several other allegation have come out about the clinic keeping even more pets alive — some with serious illnesses — for the use of blood transfusions and other experimental treatments.

“You have a vet keeping dogs under false pretenses,” Eggleston told the Star-Telegram. “You have family pets that people thought were cremated or put down peacefully that may still be alive.”

According to the Star-Telegram’s detailing of the allegations, the Harris’ complaint said they had taken their dog to the clinic to be treated for issues related to some of his glands. They said Dr. Tierce had suggested a new kind of treatment for their dog, and so the family had left Sid in the vet’s care back in May of 2013. In September 2013 the family went to visit their dog to find him unable to use his hind legs. It was at that point they said they agreed to let the clinic handle the dog’s euthanization and burial.

Six months later in April 2014, after receiving the phone call from the clinic’s former employee stating their pet was still living at the facility, the family said they worked together to distract a front desk employee as one of them made their way back to the cages where they discovered their dog and later rescued him. At the time, the Harris’ said Dr. Tierce claimed his reason for not putting their dog to sleep was to prevent one of his employees from quitting.

The family said they took Sid to a different veterinarian’s office where they said it was discovered the dog had been taped for blood transfusions, and that it was not necessary for him to be euthanized.

In the past week after hearing about the allegations against the clinic, some pet owners who had had their animals supposedly put down by the vet, have shown up at the clinic hoping their animals might still be alive.

CLICK HERE to read more on this story.

Watch more here:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Kyle

    Doesn’t matter if the complaint was made by a “Disgruntled employee who cant let go of her job”, the sicko lied to a family and kept a dog under the worst conditions. The employee did the right thing by telling the family. He should lose his clinic, his license, and everything else because this is truly disgusting…

  • Tricia

    It’s just as sick & sad that others there knew what was going on & let it continue for so long. They are all just as guilty as that sick, disgusting p.o.s.
    No job is worth that kind of sick lie to go on for even one day.

  • Laurie

    I don’t understand why people don’t stay with their pets until the very end. It’s selfish if you don’t want to bear seeing them like that, they are probably already scared, the least you could do is stay with them– especially if you claim that they are “members of your family.” Anyway, that was my first thought right after how sick this vet and his staff are. I only wish the employee who came forward did it sooner.

  • Amy B.

    They left their pet from May until September? What??? I’m fairly certain a “member of my family” would be seen AT LEAST every week. How did they not know what was happening to him/her during that time?!

    This sounds fishy to me. I understand this is awful and I would KILL my vet if this happened to me… However, did the family not request to say “goodbye” after the pet was euthanized? I’d have to see my pup. She DOES mean the world to me and I’d be a terrible mess. I’d want to be with her for quite a while after the procedure.

    Doesn’t make sense…. I’m sorry, but it sounds like they’re jumping on the publicity bandwagon and playing the victims. That dog deserved better from the vet AND (more importantly) from the family.

  • Stephanie Fletcher

    This is truly sickening… but here’s the thing… if I was told by MY vet that my beloved dog HAD to be euthanized for medical reasons I would
    1) get a second opinion on the matter and do everything I could to actually save my pet vs simply taking their word for it.
    2) request to be present during the euthanasia. If I was told that isn’t possible I would ask to see the body of my dog following the euthanasia. Number 2 is for closure purposes on my part, but also serves as confirmation that the vet is acting honestly as well as comforting my pet as they pass on. If I was denied either request I would not have left my pet with the vet to be euthanized alone. In this case, as harsh as it sounds, the owner is as much at fault as the vet for this deplorable act. I couldn’t imagine leaving my furbabies in the hands of another to die on a cold medical table scared and alone.

  • wwe shirt

    Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after
    reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
    Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back

  • Olga

    This is a very saddening story so far that I have read for a pet. We all know that vets are the ones that we really need once our beloved pets got into trouble medically or physically. For this deception that, to be honest, I just loss a trust for those kinds vets. Next time be sure to fully know your vet. We entrust our beloved pets for them so we must know them very well.